Does Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Levels Determine the Prognosis of Covid-19 Disease in Kidney Transplant Recipients?

BACKGROUND: In the normal population, a high monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1) level is an important biomarker for the progression of COVID-19. This study investigated whether MCP-1 level can determine the disease prognosis in kidney transplant (KT) patients with COVID-19. METHODS: A total of 89 patients, including 49 KT patients (group 1) diagnosed with COVID-19 who required hospitalization, and 40 KT patients who did not have COVID-19 disease (group 2), were included. Demographic characteristics and laboratory results of the patients were recorded. The serum reserved for MCP-1 was stored at -80°C and studied blindly by a single microbiologist at the end of the study. RESULTS: While the mean age of the patients was 51.0 years (40.0-59.50) in group 1, it was 48.0 years (40.75-54.75) in group 2 (P > .05). In terms of the female sex, it was 36 (73.5%) and 27 (67.5%) in group 1 and group 2, respectively (P > .05). Similarly, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding primary disease and basal graft function (P > .05). There was a statistically significant difference in inflammation indicators in group 1 compared with group 2 (P < .05). A correlation was found between inflammation indicators and COVID-19 (P < .05). However, no significant correlation was detected between COVID-19 disease and MCP-1 levels in both groups (P > .05). Also, according to basal MCP-1 levels, we did not find a significant difference between survival and nonsurvival patients (164.0 pg/mL [146.0-202.0] vs 156.0 pg/mL [143.0-173.0], respectively (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Monocyte chemoattractant protein, an indicator of inflammation, was not found to predict the prognosis of COVID-19 disease in kidney recipients.

Can fetuin-A deficiency predict the severity of COVID-19 disease in kidney transplant recipients?

Background This study aims to investigate whether fetuin A deficiency predicts the prognosis of COVID-19 disease in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Method The study was conducted on 35 hospitalized KTRs with COVID-19 pneumonia between November 2020 and June 2021. Serums were collected for fetuin-A measurement at admission and after six months of follow-up. The demographic and laboratory data of the patients were recorded and analyzed with the appropriate statistical method. Results A total of 35 KTRs, 23 of which (65.7%) were men, were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 51.6±14.0 years. Seventeen (48.6%) patients had severe disease criteria and required intensive care (ICU) support. Biopsy-proven acute rejection developed in 6 (17.1%) patients in the follow-up. At admission, the median fetuin-A value was 173.5 mcg/mL (143.5-199.25) in the moderate disease group and 126.0 mcg/mL (89.4-165.5) in the severe patient group (p=0.005). While the Median fetuin-A value at the time of diagnosis was 173.5 mcg/mL (143.5-199.25), and in the 6th month was 208 mcg/mL [184-229] (p<0.001). By ROC analysis, the effect of serum fetuin-A level in predicting the severity of COVID-19 disease was significant (AUC: 0.771, p=0.006, 95% CI: 0.615-0.927). When serum fetuin-A cut-off value was taken as 138 mcg/mL to determine disease severity, it was shown to have 83.3% sensitivity and 64.7% specificity. Conclusions Serum fetuin-A level can predict disease severity in kidney transplant recipients in the presence of active COVID-19 disease.

Does Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Levels determine the prognosis of COVID-19 disease in kidney transplant recipients?

Background In the normal population, a high MCP-1 level is an important biomarker for the progression of COVID-19 disease. This study aimed to investigate whether MCP-1 level can determine the disease prognosis in kidney transplant (KT) patients with COVID-19. Methods A total of 89 patients, including 49 KT patients (Group 1) diagnosed with COVID-19 who required hospitalization, and 40 KT patients who did not have COVID-19 disease (Group 2), were included. Demographic characteristics and laboratory results of the patients were recorded. The serum reserved for MCP-1 was stored at -80 degrees and studied blindly by a single microbiologist at the end of the study. Results While the mean age of the patients was 51.0 (40.0-59.50) years in Group 1, it was 48.0 (40.75-54.75) years in Group 2(P>0.05). In terms of the female gender, it was 36 (73.5%) and 27 (67.5%) in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (P>0.05). Similarly, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding primary disease and basal graft function (p>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in inflammation indicators in Group 1 compared to Group 2(P<0.05). A correlation was found between inflammation indicators and COVID-19(P<0.05). However, no significant correlation was detected between COVID-19 disease and MCP-1 levels in both groups (P>0.05). Also, according to basal MCP-1 levels, we did not find a significant difference between survival and non-survival patients (164,0pg/mL (146,0-202,0) vs 156,0 pg/mL (143,0-173,0), respectively (p>0.05). Conclusion MCP-1, an indicator of inflammation, was not found to be a predictor of prognosis of COVID-19 disease in kidney recipients.

Evaluation of Using Direct Viral Transport Medium Samples without Nucleic Acid Isolation for SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis by RT-PCR.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test is a very important step for the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study is to compare the RT-PCR results of the samples taken directly from the viral transport medium (VTM) without extraction with the RT-PCR results of two different extraction methods, one automated and the other manual, in the diagnosis of COVID-19. METHODS: Among the respiratory tract samples sent to Sakarya Training and Research Hospital Microbiology Laboratory for COVID-PCR study, 20 negative and 43 positive samples with different cycle threshold (CT) values were included in the study. Both manual nucleic acid isolation with the vNAT isolation kit (Bioeksen, Turkey) and automatic nucleic acid isolation with the EZ1 Virus Mini Kit v2.0 in the isolation device were performed simulta-neously from the patient samples included in the study and the results were compared. RESULTS: The mean Ct values of the samples were found to be 21.58 using manual vNAT as the extraction method, 17.63 using the automated magnetic bead method, and 21.45 in PCR from direct VTM without extraction. When the automatic magnetic beads extraction method was taken as the reference method, the sensitivity of direct PCR was 97.3%, the specificity was 95%, the positive predictive value was 97.3%, and the negative predictive value was 95%. Phi coefficients were found to be 0.927 between vNAT and direct PCR, 1 between vNAT and EZ1, and 0.922 between direct PCR and EZ1. CONCLUSIONS: Direct PCR has advantages such as eliminating RNA extraction and purification steps, providing a shorter detection time, and using less labor and less consumables without reducing the diagnostic accuracy. It is thought that this method can help as a useful process management for the control of the epidemic in countries with limited resources.

[Shedding of SARS-CoV-2 Virus in COVID-19 Patients and Neutralizing Antibody Level]. / COVID-19 Hastalarinda SARS-CoV-2 Virüs Saçilimi ve Nötralizan Antikor Düzeyleri.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) turned into a pandemic shortly after emerging in December 2019, in the city of Wuhan, China. In this study, it was aimed to investigate the presence of severe acute respiratory system coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA in various clinical samples and the scattering profile of the virus and the variation of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and neutralizing antibody levels over time in infected patients during and after the period of COVID-19 disease. The study included COVID-19 patients from the community (CCP) (n= 47) (May-June 2020) and healthcare workers (HCWP) (n= 30) (November-December 2020). To investigate the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples, oropharynx (OF), nasopharynx (NF), sputum, stool, blood and urine samples were taken from the CCP group on days 0, 3, 7, 14 and 28. For the detection of anti SARS-CoV-2 IgG and neutralizing antibodies serum samples were taken from the CCP group on days 0, 3, 7, 14, 28, 60, 90 and 120 and on days 14, 28, 60, 90, 120 and 150 from HCWP group. Virus RNA was detected by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), anti SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), neutralizing antibody levels (NAb) by cell culture neutralization and representative neutralization test (sVNT) methods. With the onset of the vaccination program in our country, 11 of the HCWP group patients had SARS-CoV-2 vaccine after the second month serum samples were taken, the remaining HCWP group patients did not get vaccinated during the study period. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected with the highest rates in NF (100%), stool (65.8%), sputum (45.7%), OF (41.3%), blood (5.3%), and urine (2.2%) samples, respectively. It was found that viral shedding continued for 14 days in respiratory tract samples and up to 60 days in stool samples, and no virus was detected in blood samples after the third day. It was observed that the viral load was highest at the time of diagnosis in both upper and lower respiratory tract samples, peaking on the seventh day in stool samples and following an irregular course throughout the disease. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody positivity was found in 41.4% of CCP group patients on the first day of diagnosis, and seroconversion was observed in all patients at the fourth month. During the study period, seropositivity was detected in only 82.1% of the patients in the HCWP group. It was observed that the IgG antibody levels peaked at the 7th day in the CCP group patients and at the third month in the HCWP group patients (S/Co: 9.6 and 2.8, respectively). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels detected in the CCP group were found to be significantly higher than the HCWP group (p<0.05). At the end of the first month, NAb was detected in all (100%) patients in the CCP group. It was found that NAb titers peaked (1/256) on the 28th day and showed a decreasing trend from the second month. NAb median titers were observed to peak earlier in the severe HCWP group (14 days in the severe group, 28 days in the mild group, p> 0.05). It was observed that 6 (26.1%) of HCWP group patients had low, 11 (47.8%) moderate, 6 (26.1%) high titers of representative NAb. The distribution of representative NAb levels by vaccine status was examined and no statistically significant difference was found (p= 0.400, p= 0.077 and p= 0.830, respectively). As a result; SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in many samples such as sputum, stool, blood and urine, and it was observed that viral shedding in stool samples could continue for months. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody positivity was observed in most of the patients in the fourth month, and it was found that the antibody titers decreased after the third month. It was determined that protective antibody levels continued in the fourth month. These findings are important in vaccination strategies and in the fight against the pandemic. However, considering the emergence of new mutant forms of the virus in today's conditions where the pandemic continues, more detailed and comprehensive studies are needed for viral shedding and antibody titer studies.

SARS-CoV-2 is not present in the vaginal fluid of pregnant women with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Data concerning the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the female genital system is scarce; however, this information is important for understanding whether the virus can transmit sexually or from mother to child. The aim of this study was to investigate whether pregnant women with COVID-19 have virus in their lower genital tract. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we present an analysis of prospectively gathered data collected at a single tertiary university hospital from 19 April to 19 May 2020. We included 13 pregnant women hospitalized with suspected COVID-19. Results of laboratory tests, imaging tests, and nucleic acid tests on vaginal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 were also analyzed for pregnant women with a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19. RESULTS: Twelve pregnant women with confirmed COVID-19 were included in this study. Mean age was 32 ± 7.9 years. All patients had mild symptoms and were followed in the maternity ward, with none of them needing critical care unit follow-up. All lower genital tract samples were negative for SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 was not present in the vaginal fluid of pregnant women. This finding may indicate that the female genital tract is not a route of SARS-CoV-2 transmission.

Short and mid-term SARS-CoV-2 antibody response after inactivated COVID-19 vaccine in hemodialysis and kidney transplant patients.

The efficacy of the inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine has not been fully elucidated across the whole spectrum of patients on kidney replacement therapy. We aimed to characterize the long-term antibody response of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine administered in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and hemodialysis (HD) patients. We performed this prospective observational study in 50 HD, 64 KTR, and 41 healthy control groups (HG) given two doses of CoronaVac. We measured anti-Spike antibodies after 28 days of every vaccine dose, 3rd and 6th months after the first dose, and compared them between cohorts. After two doses, an anti-spike immunoglobulin G of ≥50 AU/ml was present in HD, KTR, and HG as 44%, 7.2%, and 58.5%, respectively (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the proportion of antibody titers peaked at 86.5%, 23%, and 97.6% (p < 0.001) at the 3rd month and decreased significantly at the 6th month in most HD and HG participants, whereas this effect was not observed in KTRs from basal until the 6th month (p < 0.001). During the follow-up, the incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 disease was higher (p < 0.003) in KTRs compared to the other groups, but there was no requirement for an intensive care unit and no death was recorded. We found a negative correlation between antibody seroconversion and age (p < 0.016). The antibody response following inactivated vaccine in dialysis patients is almost comparable to controls for 6 months. In contrast, kidney transplant patients have a poor response. These findings reinforce the need to discuss the vaccination strategy in immunocompromised patients, including the third dose with homologous or heterologous vaccines.

Investigation of the Presence of SARS-CoV-2 in Aerosol After Dental Treatment.

AIMS: The objective of the present study was to investigate the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in aerosol and COVID-19 contamination distance asssociated with ultrasonic scaling and tooth preparation. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with COVID-19 were included in this study. Removal of supragingival plaque with ultrasonic instruments for 10 minutes and high-speed air-turbine using for the simulation of cutting the maxillary right canine tooth with a round diamond bur for 5 minutes were performed. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups: In group A, medium-volume suction was used during treatment. In group B, high-volume suction with an aerosol cannula was added to medium-volume suction. Prior to treatment, 5 glass petri dishes containing viral transport medium were placed in the operating room. After treatment, petri dishes were immediately delivered to a microbiology laboratory for real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. RESULTS: RT-PCR test results were negative for all specimens in group B. However, 5 positive test results for COVID-19 were detected in group A specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Suction with an aerosol cannula is very important to prevent COVID-19 viral contamination via aerosol. In addition, a high-volume suction capacity (air volume) of 150 mm Hg or 325 L/min is sufficient for elimination of viral contamination. Thus, high-volume suction should be used during dental treatments in COVID-19 patients.

Evaluation of the presence of SARS-COV-2 in the vaginal fluid of reproductive-aged women.

OBJECTIVES: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is mainly transmitted through respiration and direct contact. The status of the infection in the female genital system is still unknown. The study aimed to evaluate whether SARS-CoV-2 is present in the vaginal fluid of women with COVID-19 infection in reproductive period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Women who were between the ages of 18-50 years and clinically confirmed to have COVID-19 infection at our hospital between 20 April-31 May 2020 were included in the study. Women who were in their menstrual cycle during the study and who had a known cervical intraepithelial lesion and/or cancer, sexually transmitted disease and history and/or symptoms of vaginitis were excluded from the study. In patients in whom no pathology was detected during the examination, a sample was taken from the vaginal fluid for PCR by using Dacron tip swab. Analysis was performed with Genesig Real-Time PCR COVID-19 kit (Primer Design, England). RESULTS: Eighteen women who were in reproductive period and diagnosed with severe COVID-19 pneumonia were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 38.16 ± 8.54. None of the patients were in their menopause period. The clinical symptoms of these women were similar to those of confirmed severe COVID-19 cases. SARS-CoV-2 was found to be negative in the samples taken from the vaginal fluid in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 virus was not detected in the vaginal fluid of the patients who tested positive for COVID-19 in reproductive period.

Relationship between serum osteopontin levels and the severity of COVID-19 infection.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an acute inflammatory respiratory disease. Osteopontin (OPN) is a glycoprotein expressed in various cell types, such as bone, immune, smooth muscle, epithelial and endothelial cells. It also acts as a regulator of immune response. The aim of the present study was to reveal the place of serum osteopontin levels in predicting severity among patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This study included 84 patients, 43 female and 45 male. Patients were divided into 2 groups, group 1 non-severe group (n: 48), group 2 severe (n: 40). Demographic data, neutrophil, lymphocyte, platelet, white blood cell counts, albumin, procalcitonin, C­reactive protein (CRP) and OPN levels were recorded. The OPN levels and these inflammatory parameters of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in terms of gender (female/male 25/23 vs. 18/22) and platelet count (178 K/µL vs. 191 K/µL) between the groups (p > 0.05). Ages (57.7 ± 17.0 years vs. 71.4 ± 12.8 years), procalcitonin (0.07 vs. 0.24 ng/mL), CRP (17 vs 158 mg/l), neutrophil count (3.7 vs 5.64 K/µL), WBC counts (5.38 vs 7.85 K/µL) and number of deaths (0 vs 26) (p < 0.001). The OPN levels (98.5 vs 13.75 ng/mL, p = 0.002) were found to be statistically higher, in group 2 than group 1. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that OPN can be used to predict the severity in patients with COVID-19.

Comparison of saliva and oro-nasopharyngeal swab sample in the molecular diagnosis of COVID-19

SUMMARY BACKGROUND Healthcare personnel are at risk of becoming infected while taking upper and/or lower respiratory tract specimens. Therefore, there is a need for sampling methods that do not risk infecting them. In this study, we aimed to compare the saliva and Oro-Nasopharyngeal Swab (ONS) sampling methods. METHODS Patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 included patients whose diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Group 2 included patients with COVID-19 compatible findings in lung computed tomography (CT), but with a negative PCR. Group 3 included patients who presented to the emergency department with COVID-19 compatible complaints but had normal CT. Saliva and ONS samples were taken on the third day of hospitalization in groups 1 and 2, whereas in group 3, they were taken at the time of admission to the hospital. RESULTS A total of 64 patients were included in the study. The average age was 51.04 ± 17.9 years, and 37 (57.8%) were male. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 27 (42.2%) patients'saliva samples. While the sensitivity and positive predictive value of saliva samples were 85.2%, specificity and negative predictive value were 89.2%. The value of kappa was in substantial agreement (0.744), and it was found statistically significant (&lt;0.001). CONCLUSIONS Saliva samples can be used instead of ONS samples in detecting SARS-CoV-2. Investigating SARS-CoV-2 with saliva is cheaper, easier for the patient and overall, and, most importantly, it poses much less risk of SARS-CoV-2 contamination to healthcare personnel. RESUMO OBJETIVO Funcionários da saúde correm risco de infecção ao coletar amostras do trato superior e/ou inferior. Portanto, existe a necessidade de métodos de coleta de amostras que não representem um risco de infecção. Neste estudo, nosso objetivo foi comparar as métodos de coleta de saliva e swab de naso e orofaringe (ONS). MÉTODOS Os pacientes foram divididos em três grupos. O Grupo 1 incluiu pacientes cujo diagnóstico de COVID-19 foi confirmado por reação em cadeia da polimerase (PCR). O Grupo 2 incluiu pacientes com achados compatíveis com COVID-19 em exames de tomografia computadorizada (TC), mas com PCR negativo. O Grupo 3 incluiu pacientes que compareceram ao departamento de emergência com queixas compatíveis com COVID-19, mas TC normal. Amostras de saliva e ONS foram coletadas no terceiro dia de internação, nos Grupos 1 e 2, já no Grupo 3, foram coletadas no momento da internação. RESULTADOS Um total de 64 pacientes foram incluídos no estudo. A média de idade foi de 51,04 ± 17,9 anos, e 37 (57,8%) eram do sexo masculino. SARS-CoV-2 foi detectado em 27 (42,2%) amostras de saliva dos pacientes. A sensibilidade e valor preditivo positivo foi de 85,2% nas amostras de saliva, já a especificidade e o valor preditivo negativo foi 89,2%. O valor de Kappa estava substancialmente de acordo (0,744) e era estatisticamente significante (&lt;0,001). CONCLUSÃO Amostras de saliva podem ser usada em vez de ONS na detecção de SARS-CoV-2. O uso de amostras de saliva para detecção de SARS-CoV-2 é mais barato, mais fácil para o paciente e em geral e, mais importante, representa um risco muito menor de contaminação de SARS-CoV-2 para os profissionais da saúde.

Is the COVID-19 disease associated with de novo nephritic syndrome?

SUMMARY INTRODUCTION: This study aims to determine the incidence of de novo nephritic syndrome (NS) in COVID-19 patients and identify its associated factors. METHODS: All ward patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were investigated. After determining the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the study population was identified. The urine dipstick test and urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) measurements were performed. Patients with de novo NS findings, nasopharyngeal swab, and urine RT-PCR tests were performed simultaneously RESULTS: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with 21 patients with COVID-19. The mean age of the patients was 42.2±8.8 years, and 71.4% of them were male. The mean duration of follow-up was 28.4±9.3 days. The urine RT-PCR test was positive in one patient (4.8%). Improvements were observed in hematuria by 71.4%, and proteinuria by 85.7% at the end of the follow-up. A significant decrease in the measured UPCR was found in comparison to the baseline(P=0.000). Also, improvements were recorded in the complete blood counts, inflammatory parameters, ferritin, and coagulation tests, compared to the baseline. There was a positive correlation between baseline UPCR and ferritin, and a negative correlation between baseline UPCR and sodium values CONCLUSION: COVID-19-induced de novo nephritic syndrome may occur mainly due to tubulointerstitial involvement and often results in spontaneous remission. However, why these findings were not present in all patients who had no comorbidities is not clear. RESUMO INTRODUÇÃO: Este estudo tem como objetivo determinar a incidência da síndrome nefrítica de novo (SN) em pacientes com COVID-19 e identificar os fatores associados. MÉTODOS: Todos os pacientes da enfermaria com pneumonia por COVID-19 foram investigados. Após a determinação dos critérios de inclusão e exclusão, a população do estudo foi identificada. Foram realizadas medições do teste da vareta da urina e da razão da creatinina das proteínas na urina (UPCR). RESULTADOS: Este estudo transversal descritivo foi realizado com 21 pacientes com COVID-19. A idade média dos pacientes foi de 42,2±8,8 anos e 71,4% dos pacientes eram do sexo masculino. A duração média do seguimento foi de 28,4±9,3 dias. O teste de RT-PCR na urina foi positivo em um paciente (4,8%). Houve melhorias observadas na hematúria em 71,4% e na proteinúria em 85,7% no final do acompanhamento. E uma diminuição significativa na UPCR medida em comparação à linha de base (p=0,000). Além disso, foram registradas melhorias nas contagens sanguíneas completas, nos parâmetros inflamatórios, nos testes de ferritina e de coagulação, comparados aos valores basais. Houve correlação positiva entre UPCR basal e ferritina, e correlação negativa entre os valores basais de UPCR e sódio. CONCLUSÃO: A síndrome nefrítica de novo induzida por COVID-19 pode ocorrer principalmente devido ao envolvimento túbulo-intersticial e frequentemente resulta em remissão espontânea. No entanto, a questão de por que esses achados não se apresentaram em todos os pacientes que não apresentavam condição comórbida não é clara.

Is the COVID-19 disease associated with de novo nephritic syndrome?

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to determine the incidence of de novo nephritic syndrome (NS) in COVID-19 patients and identify its associated factors. METHODS: All ward patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were investigated. After determining the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the study population was identified. The urine dipstick test and urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) measurements were performed. Patients with de novo NS findings, nasopharyngeal swab, and urine RT-PCR tests were performed simultaneously. RESULTS: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with 21 patients with COVID-19. The mean age of the patients was 42.2±8.8 years, and 71.4% of them were male. The mean duration of follow-up was 28.4±9.3 days. The urine RT-PCR test was positive in one patient (4.8%). Improvements were observed in hematuria by 71.4%, and proteinuria by 85.7% at the end of the follow-up. A significant decrease in the measured UPCR was found in comparison to the baseline(P=0.000). Also, improvements were recorded in the complete blood counts, inflammatory parameters, ferritin, and coagulation tests, compared to the baseline. There was a positive correlation between baseline UPCR and ferritin, and a negative correlation between baseline UPCR and sodium values. CONCLUSION: COVID-19-induced de novo nephritic syndrome may occur mainly due to tubulointerstitial involvement and often results in spontaneous remission. However, why these findings were not present in all patients who had no comorbidities is not clear.

Comparison of saliva and oro-nasopharyngeal swab sample in the molecular diagnosis of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare personnel are at risk of becoming infected while taking upper and/or lower respiratory tract specimens. Therefore, there is a need for sampling methods that do not risk infecting them. In this study, we aimed to compare the saliva and Oro-Nasopharyngeal Swab (ONS) sampling methods. METHODS: Patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 included patients whose diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Group 2 included patients with COVID-19 compatible findings in lung computed tomography (CT), but with a negative PCR. Group 3 included patients who presented to the emergency department with COVID-19 compatible complaints but had normal CT. Saliva and ONS samples were taken on the third day of hospitalization in groups 1 and 2, whereas in group 3, they were taken at the time of admission to the hospital. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients were included in the study. The average age was 51.04 ± 17.9 years, and 37 (57.8%) were male. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 27 (42.2%) patients' saliva samples. While the sensitivity and positive predictive value of saliva samples were 85.2%, specificity and negative predictive value were 89.2%. The value of kappa was in substantial agreement (0.744), and it was found statistically significant (<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Saliva samples can be used instead of ONS samples in detecting SARS-CoV-2. Investigating SARS-CoV-2 with saliva is cheaper, easier for the patient and overall, and, most importantly, it poses much less risk of SARS-CoV-2 contamination to healthcare personnel.